An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’

dc.contributor.authorJaime A Teixeira da Silva
dc.contributor.authorMina Moradzadeh
dc.contributor.authorKwabena Osei Kuffour Adjei
dc.contributor.authorChristopher M Owusu-Ansah
dc.contributor.authorMulubrhan Balehegn
dc.contributor.authorEduardo I Faúndez
dc.contributor.authorManthan D Janodia
dc.contributor.authorAceil Al-Khatib
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T13:35:41Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T13:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe issue of ‘predatory publishing’, and indeed unscholarly publishing practices, affects all academics and librarians around the globe. However, there are some flaws in arguments and analyses made in several papers published on this topic, in particular those that have relied heavily on the blacklists that were established by Jeffrey Beall. While Beall advanced the discussion on ‘predatory publishing’, relying entirely on his blacklists to assess a journal for publishing a paper is problematic. This is because several of the criteria underlying those blacklists were insufficiently specific, excessively broad, arbitrary with no scientific validation, or incorrect identifiers of predatory behavior. The validity of those criteria has been deconstructed in more detail in this paper. From a total of 55 criteria in Beall's last/latest 2015 set of criteria, we suggest maintaining nine, eliminating 24, and correcting the remaining 22. While recognizing that this exercise involves a measure of subjectivity, it needs to advance in order to arrive – in a future exercise – at a more sensitive set of criteria. Fortified criteria alone, or the use of blacklists and whitelists, cannot combat ‘predatory publishing’, and an overhaul of rewards-based academic publishing is needed, supported by a set of reliable criteria-based guidance system.
dc.identifier.citationda Silva, J. A. T., Moradzadeh, M., Adjei, K. O. K., Owusu-Ansah, C. M., Balehegn, M., Faúndez, E. I., ... & Al-Khatib, A. (2022). An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(1), 102481.
dc.identifier.otherhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0099133321001725
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102481
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.aamusted.edu.gh/handle/123456789/481
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Journal of Academic Librarianship
dc.titleAn integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
MY PUBICATIONS.pdf
Size:
2.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: